RussianEnglish
RU flag
Press Releases
Press Release on XXIX Winter Universiade 2019 in Krasnoyarsk, Russia

13.02.2019

The XXIX Winter Universiade 2019 will take place in the city of Krasnoyarsk, the Eastern Siberia, on March 2-12, 2019. Athletes will compete 76 sets of awards in 11 sports. The youth version of the Olympics, the World Sport Games, or simply the Universiade has been the second global and representative international event in the world’s sports arena for more than 50 years.

The Universiade is the international sports competitions among students, holding under the aegis of the International University Sports Federation (FISU). Student competitions are held every two years, unlike the four-year Olympic events. The program of the Universiade includes compulsory (the list is approved by FISU prior to the start of the bidding campaign) and optional (additional) sports that the host country determines, provided that they meet all the requirements of the International University Sports Federation.

The corporate style was worked out specially for the XXIX Winter Universiade Krasnoyarsk 2019. The logo of the Winter Universiade 2019, the official mascot of the competitions U-Laika, slogans “Real Winter”, “Welcome to Winter”, “100% Winter”, as well as the name “Winter Universiade Krasnoyarsk 2019” and names derived from it, the original graphics and color layout in decoration of the Games are the elements of the registered trade mark.

U-Laika is the official mascot of the Winter Universiade Krasnoyarsk 2019, a Siberian dog of Laika breed. It is a symbol of loyalty, friendliness, joy and everlasting energy. Design of the future Games mascot started during the period of bid campaign for the right to host the Winter Universiade 2019. Various art and design studios of Krasnoyarsk took part in the development process. Laika is a friend that is always ready to help in an hour of need and offer support in achieving different goals, even the most difficult ones. The mascot was approved as an official symbol of the Winter Universiade Krasnoyarsk 2019 and is used as an integral part of the brand book and look of the Games.

“Welcome to Winter!”

The Embassy of the Russian Federation
in the Republic of Botswana

Press release on the Russian position in connection with UN Security Council reform

25.01.2019

The UN Security Council reform has been discussed for several decades. Unfortunately, any reform model wasn’t able to win as much support from the member states as necessary for the UN Charter amendments. Russia calls for continuing the search for a solution convenient to most UN members. Consensus is the best option. It is important for the talks to be comprehensive and transparent and to consider all the proposals without setting any deadlines.

The Aachen treaty signed by France and German on January 22, 2019, confirms Paris’s general support for the German aspiration to acquire a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. There is nothing new here: France has declared it many times before. However, the issue of the permanent status of Germany in the UN Security Council will not be addressed in the bilateral French-German format. Such a decision must be taken by the UN General Assembly following intergovernmental talks held in New York with the participation of all UN members.

Russia’s principled position on UN Security Council reform is to expand the representation of developing African, Asian and Latin American countries. Our country has no doubt that there are many countries among them that can make a significant contribution to supporting international peace and security. In the current Security Council, including its permanent members, we can see an obvious overrepresentation of certain regions; above all the regional group of Western states, that exists within the United Nations.

In any case, Russia cannot allow efforts to make the Security Council more representative affect its effectiveness and performance. Whatever form the reform takes, the UN Security Council must respond to challenges and threats swiftly and adequately. This means that it is necessary for the new council to remain quite compact.

The Russian side as well will not deny being skeptical of the idea of limiting the veto, as advocated by France and several other countries, and sees this mechanism as an important element of searching for balanced and calibrated decisions and protecting the interests of the minority. It is no secret that the Western group could easily mobilise the necessary votes to block unwanted projects without the veto.

Russia consistently speaks in support of a harmonious system of international relations, whose key principles include the political resolution of all crises and an end to violent regime change. If everyone followed these principles, the polemics around the veto right would not be so heated.

The Embassy of the Russian Federation
in the Republic of Botswana

Press Release on developments involving the INF Treaty

09.01.2019

After US President Donald Trump’s public statements about Washington’s intention to withdraw from the INF Treaty unilaterally, politicians, diplomats, and other related experts, as well as the entire world community have been focused on this matter.

There is no doubt that back then, the Treaty between the Soviet Union and the United States signed in 1987on the elimination of their intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles was a major milestone in building a Euro-Atlantic security architecture in the new historical period. Specifically, following the implementation of the INF Treaty, an entire class, or more precisely, two classes of nuclear weapons were removed from the arsenals of the parties: intermediate-range ballistic missiles and ground-launched cruise missiles having ranges from 1,001 to 5,500 km, and shorter-range missiles, i.e. with ranges from 500 to 1,000 km.

December 4, 2018 US Secretary of State M. Pompeo said that if “Russia does not return to compliance with the INF Treaty” after two months, Washington will suspend the implementation of the Treaty and begin a six-month counting provided for in this agreement for termination. But that there is practically nothing to “suspend” in the implementation of the INF Treaty. The elimination of the missile weapons that fell within the scope of the Treaty was carried out many years ago. Thus, the Treaty at the present time can only be broken by the production and deployment of prohibited classes of missiles, which is completely excluded from the Russian side. Therefore, after the expiration of the two-month period declared by Washington, no legal consequences will come and the Treaty will remain in force for all its parties.

The groundless and unfounded accusations made against Russia by the United States and the presumptuous manner in which they were publicly voiced are absolutely unacceptable. They never once specified their suspicions regarding the range of the 9M729 missile and continued to refer exclusively to the maximum range of 500 to 5500 km under the Treaty. Russian Federation informed the United States that the 9M729 missile was launched at its maximum range at the Kapustin Yar testing ground on September 18, 2017 as part of the West-2017 exercises. It covered less than 480 km.

At the same time, the main problems and risks for the Treaty turned out to be connected with the long-term actions of the American side contrary to their commitments under the agreement.

First problem concerns the problematic issue of US unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with strike potential. This heralded the creation of a US weapons system, unequivocally covered by the INF Treaty. Despite our longtime appeals, the United States stubbornly refuses to address this matter within the framework of the Treaty, virtually ignoring the Russian concern.

Second problem that remains unresolved has to do with the large-scale programmes by the Pentagon to use the so-called target missiles during what is presented as missile defence tests. Russia has every reason to suspect that under the guise of these programmes the US is working on maintaining and developing technological, industrial and to some extent combat capabilities of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles that are banned by the INF Treaty.

Next Russian complaint about US actions was also formulated many years ago. Our country is referring to the deployment of the ?k-41 universal vertical launcher as part of the Aegis Ashore missile systems in Europe, allegedly for purely anti-missile purposes. However, contrary to the INF Treaty, the Mk-41 system can be used to launch ground-based Tomahawk intermediate-range cruise missiles and other strike weapons. Russia sees this as a direct and flagrant violation of the INF Treaty.

The world is increasingly aware of the risks and threats this rash decisions could entail not only for regional but also for global international security and stability as a whole. Russia subscribes to the view that a comprehensive, equitable and result-oriented dialogue is long overdue, given the backlog of problems in this sphere. Our proposals on this score were conveyed back at the Russian-US summit in Helsinki in July of last year. Moreover, Russia introduced draft resolution “Preservation of and compliance with the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty” for the consideration in the UN General Assembly in December of last year. But, as Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs S. Lavrov said , “entire European Union voted against our proposal, so that the INF Treaty would in fact cease to exist, and that US missiles, prohibited in accordance with the Treaty, would be deployed and this would threaten Europe once again”.

The Russian Federation would still like to hope that Washington and its European allies will after all display the political will and respond to Russian initiative in a constructive way.

The Embassy of the Russian Federation
in the Republic of Botswana


News for 2018 News for 2017 News for 2016 News for 2015 News for 2014